Editorial principles
We care about repeatable outcomes: time saved, errors reduced, decisions improved or revenue created. We avoid breathless coverage of demos that have not survived contact with real work.
When reporting news, we distinguish what a company announced from what we independently observed. When publishing a workflow, we explain its limitations and where human review belongs.
How reviews work
Tools are evaluated against a defined task. We consider output quality, reliability, privacy, learning curve and total cost—not just the quality of a first demo.
Commercial policy
Some future links may be affiliate links. If we earn a commission, the article will say so clearly. Payment never guarantees a positive verdict. Sponsored material will be labelled, and sponsors will not approve independent editorial coverage.
Corrections and contact
If we get something wrong, email hello@thepragmaticagent.com. You can also follow The Pragmatic Agent on LinkedIn. Material corrections will be noted on the article.